skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Junno, Juho‐Antti"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Objectives

    While many attempts have been made to estimate body mass in hominins from lower limb bone dimensions, the upper limb has received far less attention in this regard. Here we develop new body mass estimation equations based on humeral articular breadths in a large modern human sample and apply them to 95 Plio‐Pleistocene specimens.

    Materials and Methods

    Humeral head superoinferior and total distal articular mediolateral breadths were measured in a morphologically diverse sample of 611 modern human skeletons whose body masses were estimated from bi‐iliac breadth and reconstructed stature. Reduced major axis regressions were used to compute body mass estimation equations. Consistency of the resulting estimates with those derived previously using lower limb bone equations was assessed in matched Plio‐Pleistocene individuals or samples.

    Results

    In the modern reference sample, the new humeral body mass estimation equations exhibit only slightly lower precision compared to the previously derived lower limb bone equations. They give generally similar estimates for PleistoceneHomo, after accounting for the different shape of the humeral head articular surface in archaic Middle and Late PleistoceneHomo, except for distal humeral estimates for Late Pleistocene specimens, which average somewhat below lower limb estimates. Humeral equations give body mass estimates for australopiths that appear much too high, except forAustralopithecus sediba. A chimpanzee‐based distal humeral articular formula appears to work well for larger australopith specimens.

    Discussion

    The new formulae provide a more secure foundation for estimating hominin body mass from humeri than previously available equations.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Objectives

    A number of studies have demonstrated the ontogenetic plasticity of long bone diaphyseal structure in response to mechanical loading. Captivity should affect mechanical loading of the limbs, but whether captive apes grow differently than wild apes has been debated. Here, we compare captive and wild juvenile and adultGorillato ascertain whether growth trajectories in cross‐sectional diaphyseal shape are similar in the two environments.

    Materials and methods

    A sample of young juvenile (n = 4) and adult (n = 10) captiveGorilla gorillagorillaspecimens, with known life histories, were compared with age‐matched wildG.g. gorilla(n = 62) andG. beringei beringei(n = 75) in relative anteroposterior to mediolateral bending strength of the femur, tibia, and humerus. Cross sections were obtained using peripheral quantitative CT.

    Results

    Captive and wild adultG.g. gorilladiffered in bending strength ratios for all three bones, but these differences were not present in young juvenileG.g. gorilla. In comparisons across taxa, captive juvenileG.g. gorillawere more similar to wildG.g. gorillathan toG.b. beringei, while captive adultG.g. gorillawere more similar in shape toG.b. beringeiin the hind limb.

    Discussion

    Captive and wildG. gorillafollow different ontogenetic trajectories in long bone diaphyseal shape, corresponding to environmental differences and subsequent modified locomotor behaviors. Differences related to phylogeny are most evident early in development.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Objectives

    The effects of phylogeny and locomotor behavior on long bone structural proportions are assessed through comparisons between adult and ontogenetic samples of extant gorillas.

    Materials and Methods

    A total of 281 wild‐collected individuals were included in the study, divided into four groups that vary taxonomically and ecologically: western lowland gorillas (G. g. gorilla), lowland and highland grauer gorillas(G. b. graueri), and Virunga mountain gorillas (G. b. beringei). Lengths and articular breadths of the major long bones (except the fibula) were measured, and diaphyseal cross‐sectional geometric properties determined using computed tomography. Ages of immature specimens (n = 145) were known or estimated from dental development. Differences between groups in hind limb to forelimb proportions were assessed in both adults and during development.

    Results

    Diaphyseal strength proportions among adults vary in parallel with behavioral/ecological differences, and not phylogeny. The more arboreal western lowland and lowland grauer gorillas have relatively stronger forelimbs than the more terrestrial Virunga mountain gorillas, while the behaviorally intermediate highland grauer gorillas have intermediate proportions. Diaphyseal strength proportions are similar in young infants but diverge after 2 years of age in western lowland and mountain gorillas, at the same time that changes in locomotor behavior occur. There are no differences between groups in length or articular proportions among either adults or immature individuals.

    Conclusion

    Long bone diaphyseal strength proportions in gorillas are developmentally plastic, reflecting behavior, while length and articular proportions are much more genetically canalized. These findings have implications for interpreting morphological variation among fossil taxa.

     
    more » « less